Knowledge base · Strategy
Ratio spreads
Ratio spreads
Definition
A ratio spread holds unequal numbers of long and short options at
different strikes, same type and expiry — most commonly one long
near-the-money option against two short further-OTM options
(“1x2”). Sold-heavy ratios collect premium and carry UNDEFINED risk
beyond the short strikes; bought-heavy ratios are the reverse and
have their own entry (strategy-backspread). This entry covers the
sold-heavy (front) ratio.
How it works / structure
- Legs (call 1x2 example): +1 call K1, −2 calls K2 (K2 > K1), same expiry; often entered at zero cost or a small credit.
- Payoff at expiry: below K1, keep the net credit (or lose the small debit); maximum profit at K2 = (K2 − K1) + net credit; above K2 + width + credit, losses grow without bound — the structure is net short one naked option beyond K2. Put 1x2s mirror this below the market.
- Parameters (engine-executable): ratio (1x2, 2x3), strike gap,
net-cost target, expiry, IV/skew gate (
iv_rank; put ratios monetize the smirk’s rich low wing —opt-volatility-skew), management (mgmt-stop-losson the underlying breaching the short strike zone,mgmt-rolling, or conversion to a defined structure by buying a wing — becomingstrategy-broken-wing-butterfly). - Greeks profile: path-dependent — the position flips from
long delta / long gamma near K1 to violently short both beyond
K2 as expiry approaches (
greek-gamma).
When it applies
“Moves toward but not through” theses — a target zone at K2 with
conviction the move stalls there; skew-monetizing entries where
the two short wings are priced rich; repair/adjustment contexts
(overlaying a ratio to move a losing position’s breakeven). The
undefined tail makes sizing and scenario analysis
(risk-scenario-analysis) load-bearing.
Risk profile & failure modes
- The thesis’s own success is the hazard: the structure makes maximum money at the short strike and unbounded losses past it — being MORE right than planned is the loss case (the inverse of most spreads); event gaps through K2 are the realized disaster mode.
- Late nonlinearity: near expiry the P&L cliff beyond K2 steepens; positions held into the final week convert a management problem into a gamma problem.
- Margin expansion: the embedded naked short means stress
margin grows exactly as the position sours
(
acct-margin-rules). - Adjustment debt: “rolling the tested side” of ratios accumulates short options; unmanaged adjustment chains grow the tail rather than closing it.
Evidence & limits
Mechanics are contract arithmetic (OCC/Cboe). No public study
establishes ratio spreads as an excess-return class; the skew
premium they monetize is measured (opt-volatility-skew
citations) but its harvest via undefined-risk structures is a
sizing question the platform grades per replay. “Zero-cost so
nothing to lose” is folklore — the cost is the open tail.
Falsifiable-thesis examples
Illustrations only, not signals:
- “X will finish the cycle between K1 and K2 (max-profit zone)” — falsified by a finish outside it.
- “X will not trade beyond K2 + width at any point before expiry” — falsified by any print past that level.
Cross-references
- Mirror image:
strategy-backspread; defined-risk conversion:strategy-broken-wing-butterfly - Pricing source:
opt-volatility-skew,opt-iv-rank-percentile - Danger mechanics:
greek-gamma,ms-expiration-exercise-assignment,acct-margin-rules - Containment:
mgmt-stop-loss,risk-scenario-analysis,risk-fixed-fractional
The agent cites this page.
Inside the platform, this entry is live context: the AI reasons from it, quotes it, and grades against it. Make your case.