Help · Knowledge base · Event playbook
Earnings announcements
Earnings announcements
Definition
Earnings are the equity market’s scheduled information events:
quarterly results plus guidance, at a known date, with the
options market pricing the expected gap in advance
(opt-expected-move). The playbook has three phases — the
run-up (IV builds, positioning accumulates), the print (the
gap, the guidance, the call), and the aftermath (IV crush and
the documented drift) — each with distinct mechanics and
distinct theses.
How it works / structure
- Pre-event structure: event-dated IV elevates above
surrounding expirations (
opt-term-structureevent bumps); the straddle price states the market’s expected move — every earnings thesis is measured against it, not against zero. - The print: results vs consensus (
fa-guidance-estimates— the comparison set), guidance vs consensus (frequently the larger mover), and the reaction’s TONE (a rally on bad news is positioning information —qualitative-analysisreaction-vs-news reading). - The aftermath: IV crush (event premium evaporates at the
print — long option positions need the move to beat the
crush,
strategy-straddleeconomics) and post-earnings- announcement drift (PEAD): Bernard-Thomas (1989) documented that extreme earnings surprises drift in the surprise’s direction for weeks — underreaction, among the most persistent documented anomalies, though attenuated in large caps in recent samples. - Engine-executable playbook parameters: hold-through vs
flat-by rules per strategy (
mgmt-time-based-exitevent boundary), expected-move multiple for strikes, post-event entry windows (drift theses), and the mandatory event flag on any position spanning the date.
When it applies
Every single-name position spans earnings or does not — the
calendar check is mandatory; volatility structures around the
event (long-vol needs the move > priced move; short-vol needs
the reverse — both stated against expected_move_pct); drift
theses post-print; fundamental theses graded at the print
(lens-fundamental falsifiers often ARE earnings lines).
Risk profile & failure modes
- The priced-move trap: “big move coming” is not a thesis — the market priced one; only a DIFFERENT move than priced is tradeable information.
- Gap-through-stops: earnings gaps skip every intraday
control (
mgmt-stop-lossgap caveat at maximum) — event spans are sizing decisions, not stop decisions. - IV crush on the right direction: long options can lose on a correct directional call when the move underperforms the crush — the decomposition belongs in the thesis.
- Drift decay: PEAD is weaker in liquid large caps recently — surprise-drift theses need the current-sample caveat.
Evidence & limits
Disclosure timing is SEC-regulated; expected-move pricing is options arithmetic. Bernard-Thomas (1989) and a large successor literature document PEAD; attenuation in recent large-cap samples is also documented. IV crush is structural (the event premium’s definition). Specific “earnings season playbooks” sold as reliable are folklore.
Falsifiable-thesis examples
Illustrations only, not signals:
- “X will move more than 1.25× its priced expected move at this print” — falsified by the realized gap.
- “Names in the top surprise decile this season will outperform their sector over the following 30 sessions (PEAD thesis)” — falsified by the cohort’s returns.
Cross-references
- The frame:
lens-event-catalyst,opt-expected-move,opt-term-structure - Structures:
strategy-straddle,strategy-strangle,strategy-calendar-spread(event-date short leg) - The comparison set:
fa-guidance-estimates,sent-analyst-revisions - Reaction reading:
qualitative-analysis
Sources
- Bernard, V. and Thomas, J. (1989), Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium? — Journal of Accounting Research 27, 1-36
- SEC — Form 8-K and quarterly reporting requirements (issuer disclosure)
The agent cites this page.
Inside the platform, this entry is live context. A signed-in citation opens the in-app view of the same id.